COVID Financial Support Update

Royal assent received

C-2
December 17, 2021 (3 years ago)
Canadian Federal
Chrystia Freeland
Liberal
House of Commons
Royal assent
2 Votes
Full Title: An Act to provide further support in response to COVID-19
Economics
Labor and Employment
Social Welfare

Summary

The proposed amendments to the Income Tax Act and Canada Labour Code aim to extend financial support measures for individuals and organizations affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Key changes include the modification of the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS) and Canada Emergency Rent Subsidy (CERS) to provide gradual reductions while allowing more organizations to maintain eligibility based on revenue decline. The amendments also extend the Canada Recovery Benefits and caregiving benefits, as well as adjust leave provisions for employees.

What it means for you

This bill impacts a variety of groups, including:

  • Employees: Those who need to take leave for health issues or caregiving during the pandemic can do so without losing their job protections or benefits.
  • Tourism and hospitality businesses: Organizations in these sectors may receive continued financial support, but only if they meet specific revenue decline criteria.
  • Individuals reliant on recovery benefits: People who are struggling due to the pandemic can access extended benefits, which are crucial for maintaining livelihoods.

Expenses

The government will incur significant spending due to the extended subsidies and benefits, which may increase national debt. This could lead to higher taxes in the future. On the individual level, while people may benefit from these programs, there are concerns that they may come at the cost of increased taxes down the line to fund these supports, impacting citizens' disposable income.

Proponents view

Supporters advocate for these amendments as necessary measures to stabilize the economy and support individuals and sectors most affected by the pandemic. They argue that continued assistance helps prevent widespread layoffs, encourages recovery, and protects the livelihoods of vulnerable groups. Proponents believe that extending benefits and support demonstrates a commitment to assisting those who are still facing hardships.

Opponents view

Critics contend that the amendments may promote dependency on government assistance, leading to a lack of incentive for individuals to return to work or for businesses to innovate. They raise concerns about long-term fiscal sustainability and the potential for increased national debt, as the government continues to provide support without clear plans for recovery. There are also worries about eligibility complexity and the risk of fraud, which could waste taxpayer money and undermine public trust in these programs. Furthermore, small businesses may feel the financial strain of extended leave policies, risking their viability as economic recovery continues.

Original Bill

Votes

Vote 18

That the bill be now read a third time and do pass.

For (57%)
Against (43%)
Vote 5

That the bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Finance.

For (59%)
Against (41%)