Protection of Freedom of Conscience Act

Bill defeated

C-230
February 4, 2022 (3 years ago)
Canadian Federal
Kelly Block
Conservative
House of Commons
Third reading
1 Votes
Full Title: An Act to amend the Criminal Code (intimidation of health care professionals)
Healthcare
Social Issues

Summary

The Protection of Freedom of Conscience Act aims to amend the Criminal Code to prevent the intimidation of health care professionals regarding their participation in medical assistance in dying (MAID). It introduces offences for both individuals using intimidation and employers who refuse to hire or dismiss employees based on their refusal to participate in MAID.

What it means for you

Health care professionals who hold strong personal beliefs against MAID will be protected from coercion, which may benefit those who share similar views. Conversely, patients seeking MAID might face challenges in accessing services, potentially impacting vulnerable groups who rely on these medical options.

Expenses

The bill may lead to increased expenses for health care employers as they navigate the complexities of hiring and legal compliance. Legal conflicts arising from disputes about employment decisions could also incur significant costs for both employers and the health care system overall. Patients may face higher costs resulting from potential delays or the need to seek services elsewhere.

Proponents view

Supporters argue that this legislation is necessary to protect the moral integrity of health care professionals and ensure they are not forced into performing tasks against their conscience. They also believe that safeguarding these rights will help retain staff in a challenging health care environment, thereby maintaining necessary services.

Opponents view

Critics highlight that this bill could undermine patient access to essential medical services, particularly for those who need MAID. They fear that the potential for professionals to refuse care based on personal beliefs may exacerbate existing inequalities in health care access. Additionally, opponents raise concerns over the financial burden this could impose on health care employers and the system as a whole, potentially deterring investment in health care sectors.

Original Bill

Votes

Vote 186

That the bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights.

For (35%)
Against (64%)
Paired (1%)