Building a Green Prairie Economy Act

Royal assent received

C-235
December 15, 2022 (2 years ago)
Canadian Federal
Jim Carr
House of Commons
Royal assent
2 Votes
Full Title: An Act respecting the building of a green economy in the Prairies
Climate and Environment
Economics
Labor and Employment

Summary

The Building a Green Prairie Economy Act aims to create a framework for developing a sustainable green economy in Canada's Prairie provinces. It involves cooperation among local governments, Indigenous groups, and the private sector to promote job creation and investments in clean technologies. However, the financial aspects and potential bureaucratic delays raise concerns.

What it means for you

Residents of the Prairie provinces, especially those working in traditional energy sectors, may be directly impacted. Job seekers in green technology could have new opportunities, while workers in fossil fuels might face uncertainties regarding their future. Local governments and Indigenous communities will have a role in the consultation process, potentially affecting their resources and capacity to engage effectively.

Expenses

The implementation of projects—like improvements to public transportation and clean energy initiatives—could lead to significant costs. There is concern about determining funding sources, which might result in increased taxes or reduced funding for other essential services. Additionally, ongoing administrative and reporting requirements may stretch resources thin, further impacting local budgets.

Proponents view

Supporters believe the act is crucial for stimulating economic growth and job creation in transitioning regions. They argue that the inclusion of diverse stakeholders will ensure tailored solutions that fit community needs. The focus on clean technologies aligns with global trends toward sustainability, which proponents view as necessary for future economic resilience.

Opponents view

Critics worry about the financial burden of implementing various green initiatives and the lack of clarity on funding. They fear that this could lead to higher taxes or cuts to vital services. Additionally, there are concerns about the potential negative impact on existing jobs in the fossil fuel sector, along with frustration over possible bureaucratic inefficiencies that could delay progress in these urgent initiatives.

Original Bill

Votes

Vote 117

That the bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Industry and Technology.

For (64%)
Against (36%)
Vote 236

That the bill be now read a third time and do pass.

For (54%)
Against (42%)
Paired (4%)