Urban Green Space Boost

Close Icon

At consideration in committee in the Senate

C-248
April 17, 2024 (10 months ago)
Canadian Federal
Brian Masse
NDP
House of Commons
Third reading
2 Votes
Full Title: An Act to amend the Canada National Parks Act (Ojibway National Urban Park of Canada)
Climate and Environment
Infrastructure
Social Issues

Summary

The proposed amendment to the Canada National Parks Act aims to create the Ojibway National Urban Park in Ontario, covering land from 13.6 to 84.5 hectares. This new park is designed to protect biodiversity and offer green space in urban areas, especially benefiting the community in Windsor.

What it means for you

Groups that may be impacted include local residents who could gain access to more recreational areas, environmentalists advocating for biodiversity, and local businesses that might benefit from increased tourism. However, local property owners could face restrictive land-use policies that affect their rights and development opportunities.

Expenses

The creation and upkeep of the park may lead to significant costs for the government, including funding for park maintenance, staff salaries, and infrastructure development. This increased spending could divert public funds from other essential services, potentially leading to higher taxes for residents to cover these expenses.

Proponents view

Supporters argue that establishing the park will protect local ecosystems, enhance environmental quality, and provide urban communities with vital green spaces. They see it as a chance to promote tourism, boost the local economy through increased visitor spending, and foster community engagement in environmental conservation efforts.

Opponents view

Critics contend that the financial burden of maintaining the park may outweigh its benefits, potentially leading to cuts in essential public services. They express concerns that land-use restrictions could hamper local economic growth and complicate property rights. They argue that it might not adequately address the immediate needs of the community and could limit opportunities for development.

Original Bill

Votes

Vote 137

That the bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development.

For (52%)
Against (45%)
Paired (4%)
Vote 305

That the bill be now read a third time and do pass.

For (97%)
Against (0%)
Paired (2%)