National Strategy on Flood and Drought Forecasting Act

Close Icon

At second reading in the Senate

C-317
June 6, 2024 (8 months ago)
Canadian Federal
Francis Scarpaleggia
Liberal
House of Commons
Third reading
2 Votes
Full Title: An Act to establish a national strategy respecting flood and drought forecasting
Climate and Environment
Infrastructure

Summary

The National Strategy on Flood and Drought Forecasting Act seeks to create a nationwide plan to improve how Canada forecasts and prepares for floods and droughts. It aims for collaboration among various government ministers and stakeholders, including Indigenous groups and industries, to ensure better management of these climate-related challenges.

What it means for you

This act could significantly impact farmers, urban residents in flood-prone areas, municipalities, Indigenous communities, and related industries. Improved forecasting may lead to better preparation and response to natural disasters, potentially saving lives and property. However, certain funding shifts might affect other public services or infrastructure projects.

Expenses

Implementing this strategy could incur substantial costs for the government, including investments in new forecasting technology, setting up a national hydrological service, and ongoing operational expenses. These costs may strain budgets and could potentially lead to funding cuts in other essential areas within the involved ministries, affecting services that citizens rely on.

Proponents view

Supporters argue that a comprehensive national strategy is crucial for safeguarding communities from the impacts of climate change. They believe investing in forecasting technologies will enhance disaster preparedness, save lives, and minimize economic losses. The collaborative approach is seen as a means to incorporate diverse perspectives, especially from Indigenous peoples, which could empower communities and foster resilience.

Opponents view

Critics of the bill express concerns over the potential financial burden it might impose and question whether it can be effectively executed due to the need for extensive coordination among various government bodies and stakeholders. They fear that significant costs could divert resources from other critical areas. Additionally, the timeframe for accountability and effectiveness reviews may be viewed as too lenient, raising doubts about timely and efficient implementation.

Original Bill

Votes

Vote 643

That the bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development.

For (99%)
Paired (1%)
Vote 801

That the bill be now read a third time and do pass.

For (96%)
Paired (4%)