New Shield for Abuse Victims

Pause Icon

Outside the Order of Precedence

C-202
November 25, 2021 (3 years ago)
Canadian Federal
Randall Garrison
NDP
House of Commons
Third reading
0 Votes
Full Title: An Act to amend the Criminal Code (controlling or coercive conduct)
Criminal Justice
Social Issues

Summary

The proposed amendment to the Criminal Code seeks to establish a new offence aimed at controlling or coercive conduct in personal relationships. This legislation recognizes that psychological abuse can cause significant harm, even when it does not involve physical violence. By defining harmful behaviors, the amendment seeks to address domestic violence more comprehensively and support victims better.

What it means for you

Victims of domestic abuse, particularly those experiencing psychological or coercive control, may find more avenues for support and protection through this legislation. Advocates for mental health and victim support groups might benefit from increased awareness and potential funding to help implement the provisions of the law. Conversely, individuals who may be falsely accused of coercive behavior could face legal challenges, impacting their personal and professional lives.

Expenses

Implementing this law may incur substantial costs for the government, including increased funding for legal processes, victim support services, and law enforcement training. The potential rise in legal cases could strain judicial resources and lead to higher public spending. Additionally, there are concerns about whether resources will be allocated toward prevention and education or primarily toward enforcement, which could limit the effectiveness of the overall strategy.

Proponents view

Supporters of the bill argue that it is crucial for protecting individuals from emotional and psychological harm. They believe it fills a gap in existing laws, allowing law enforcement to take action against abusive behaviors that may not lead to physical violence but are nonetheless damaging. Proponents emphasize that clearer definitions of coercive control could improve victim reporting and intervention practices while ultimately reducing the costs associated with long-term health issues stemming from such abuse.

Opponents view

Critics express concerns about the potential for legal overreach and the subjective interpretation of the law, fearing it could undermine due process rights. They worry about the financial burden of increased legal proceedings and how the broad definitions may lead to misuse of the law. Additionally, there is anxiety that focusing on punitive measures could divert necessary funding from preventive programs aimed at fostering healthy relationships, ultimately falling short of addressing the root causes of domestic abuse.

Original Bill