Boosting Employment Insurance

Close Icon

Bill not proceeded with

C-215
December 12, 2022 (2 years ago)
Canadian Federal
Jacques Gourde
Conservative
House of Commons
Third reading
1 Votes
Full Title: An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (illness, injury or quarantine)
Labor and Employment
Healthcare
Social Welfare

Summary

The proposed amendment to the Employment Insurance Act seeks to extend the maximum duration of benefits for individuals who are ill, injured, or quarantined from 15 weeks to 52 weeks. This change aims to provide longer-term support for those facing health challenges.

What it means for you

Individuals dealing with long-term illness or recovery may experience less financial stress as they can rely on extended benefits during their time off work. Families with members suffering from health issues could find relief in the more substantial support. However, taxpayers might feel the impact of potentially increased contributions to sustain these extended benefits, and those who may rely on such assistance could face scrutiny regarding their willingness to return to work.

Expenses

The extension of benefits could result in substantial costs for the government, which may need to allocate more funds to the Employment Insurance program. This could translate into higher premiums for employers and employees to fund the system. Additionally, extended benefits might lead to increased administrative costs due to the complexity of implementing the new changes, potentially resulting in confusion and delays for beneficiaries.

Proponents view

Supporters argue that the extension is critical for helping individuals recover from serious health issues without the pressure of financial ruin. They believe it can foster a smoother transition back into the workforce and ultimately lead to healthier, more productive members of society, especially in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Opponents view

Critics contend that extending the benefit period could place an undue financial burden on the Employment Insurance fund and taxpayers. They argue that it might dissuade individuals from returning to work quickly, leading to long-term dependence on government assistance. Furthermore, the added complexity in administration could lead to inefficiencies and confusion, potentially making it harder for recipients to access the support they need.

Original Bill

Votes

Vote 153

That the bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities.

For (52%)
Against (46%)
Paired (2%)