Prohibition of Fur Farming

Pause Icon

Outside the Order of Precedence

C-247
February 8, 2022 (3 years ago)
Canadian Federal
House of Commons
Third reading
0 Votes
Full Title: An Act to prohibit fur farming
Social Issues
Animal Welfare

Summary

The Prohibition of Fur Farming Act seeks to ban fur farming entirely by prohibiting the ownership, breeding, and slaughtering of fur-bearing animals for commercial purposes. The legislation includes strict penalties for violations, including fines up to $250,000 and possible jail time. It also grants courts the authority to impose additional restrictions and forfeiture of animals involved in violations.

What it means for you

Groups that may be impacted include fur farmers and workers who rely on the industry for their livelihoods, animal welfare advocates, and local communities that benefit economically from fur farming. Additionally, animal shelters may face challenges with increased numbers of displaced animals needing care.

Expenses

The bill may lead to increased government spending for the care and housing of animals confiscated due to violations. Fur farmers and workers could incur costs related to business closures and potential job losses. While there is mention of a compensation regime for affected stakeholders, the lack of clarity around this could create financial uncertainty for those involved in the fur industry.

Proponents view

Supporters advocate that banning fur farming protects animal welfare and aligns with growing ethical concerns in society. They believe the legislation will foster a shift toward humane agricultural practices and sustainable economies focused on ethical alternatives, discouraging illegal fur farming activities through tough penalties.

Opponents view

Critics view the bill as an overreach of government that threatens the livelihoods of those in the fur farming industry, potentially leading to significant job losses and economic downturns in local communities. They argue that the legislation could be seen as ineffective in genuinely improving animal welfare, as it may simply push the fur trade underground, where conditions for animals could worsen. The financial burden on governmental resources for housing confiscated animals is also a major concern, coupled with vague compensation provisions leaving agricultural stakeholders anxious about their futures.

Original Bill