Bank of Canada Accountability Act

Bill defeated

C-253
February 9, 2022 (3 years ago)
Canadian Federal
Andrew Scheer
Conservative
House of Commons
Third reading
1 Votes
Full Title: An Act to amend the Bank of Canada Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts
Economics
Social Welfare

Summary

The Bank of Canada Accountability Act aims to introduce the Auditor General of Canada as a primary auditor for the Bank of Canada, alongside a private accounting firm. This move will bring annual audits over five years to improve transparency and accountability in the Bank's financial operations.

What it means for you

The proposed changes may primarily impact taxpayers and citizens who rely on the financial stability of the Bank of Canada. Enhanced auditing could lead to more efficient allocation of taxpayer money and, theoretically, should foster greater public confidence in the Bank’s operations. However, the increased costs and bureaucratic processes could affect the resources available for public services.

Expenses

The financial burden of employing external accounting firms for annual audits could potentially be significant. The funds spent on these audits might be substantial, and critics argue these expenses could detract from funding critical public sectors like healthcare and education. The government and taxpayers could ultimately bear the costs of these audits, raising questions about economic efficiency.

Proponents view

Supporters of the bill argue that involving the Auditor General will improve oversight and accountability, which can lead to more responsible management of public funds. They believe that stringent audits will help prevent mismanagement and financial inaccuracies, thereby preserving trust in the Bank of Canada’s operations and financial reporting.

Opponents view

Critics express concerns about the potential for diminishing the operational independence of the Bank of Canada. Frequent audits could lead to increased bureaucracy and inefficiency, potentially hindering the Bank's ability to function effectively. Furthermore, the costs associated with external audits may outweigh the benefits, leading critics to question whether these funds could be better spent on more pressing public needs, rather than on administrative oversight.

Original Bill

Votes

Vote 196

That the bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Finance.

For (35%)
Against (63%)
Paired (2%)