Boosting Canadian Business

Pause Icon

Outside the Order of Precedence

C-300
October 24, 2022 (2 years ago)
Canadian Federal
Lindsay Mathyssen
NDP
House of Commons
Third reading
0 Votes
Full Title: An Act to amend the Department of Public Works and Government Services Act, the Defence Production Act and the Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act (Canadian products and services)
Economics
Trade and Commerce

Summary

This political bill introduces amendments to prioritize Canadian products and services in government procurement, requiring that government ministers choose these options unless restricted by international agreements.

What it means for you

This change impacts local businesses and workers by potentially increasing their opportunities in government contracts. Canadian manufacturers and service providers may benefit from more government projects directed their way. However, consumers and foreign businesses could experience higher prices and reduced competitiveness.

Expenses

The bill includes a provision for a $100,000 annual cash contribution to each province to support local procurement. This could lead to increased costs for government contracts if Canadian products and services are more expensive than their international counterparts, straining government budgets. Additionally, if international relationships suffer, it could create indirect costs through potential sanctions or trade retaliation.

Proponents view

Supporters argue that this bill will strengthen the Canadian economy by promoting local job creation, enhancing domestic production, and fostering economic resilience. They believe that investing in Canadian businesses will lead to a more robust economy and mitigate the risks associated with relying on foreign products and services.

Opponents view

Critics express concern that the preference for Canadian products may raise government procurement costs, creating inefficiencies and budget strain. They worry that such policies could alienate international trading partners and breach trade agreements, potentially resulting in economic retaliation. Additionally, there is skepticism about the effectiveness of diverting funds from other essential services to support this initiative.

Original Bill