Free Menstrual Products at Work

Pause Icon

Outside the Order of Precedence

C-307
November 21, 2022 (2 years ago)
Canadian Federal
Don Davies
NDP
House of Commons
Third reading
0 Votes
Full Title: An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code (menstrual products)
Labor and Employment
Social Issues

Summary

The proposed amendment to the Canada Labour Code requires federally regulated employers to provide free menstrual products to employees at their workplaces. This aims to improve workplace hygiene and inclusivity, recognizing the challenges some individuals face in obtaining these essential products.

What it means for you

This amendment impacts anyone working for federally regulated employers, particularly women and non-binary individuals who menstruate. Those who struggle financially may benefit the most as they would have easier access to menstrual products without bearing the cost themselves. However, small business employees may see indirect effects if their employers reduce other benefits to accommodate this requirement.

Expenses

Employers will incur costs associated with purchasing, supplying, and maintaining menstrual product dispensers in the workplace. This may lead to increased operational expenses, and employers might need to consider budget reallocations, which could affect salaries, cuts in other employee benefits, or additional hiring. The financial burden may particularly impact small businesses that lack the resources to easily absorb these new costs.

Proponents view

Supporters argue that providing free menstrual products is essential for promoting gender equality, helping to remove stigma around menstruation. They believe that such a provision can enhance employee morale and productivity by ensuring workers do not miss work due to a lack of menstrual supplies. Advocates claim that investing in menstrual health leads to long-term benefits, fostering an inclusive work culture.

Opponents view

Critics express concern over the financial implications for employers, especially small businesses that might find it challenging to meet the additional costs. They argue that this mandate could lead to budget cutbacks in other areas, affecting employee benefits or hiring practices. Additionally, some believe that the focus should be on broader employee health benefits rather than concentrating solely on menstrual products, which may detract from addressing other significant workplace health issues.

Original Bill