Job Security for Airport Workers

Pause Icon

Outside the Order of Precedence

C-330
April 20, 2023 (2 years ago)
Canadian Federal
Alexandre Boulerice
NDP
House of Commons
Third reading
0 Votes
Full Title: An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code (successor rights and obligations — airports)
Labor and Employment

Summary

The proposed amendment to the Canada Labour Code would require airport authorities and service providers to maintain the existing certification of previous contractors' trade unions and uphold the terms and conditions of employment when contract changes occur. This aims to provide job security for airport workers during such transitions.

What it means for you

This amendment could significantly impact airport workers, particularly those employed by contractors. Employees may experience increased job stability and protection of their rights during contract changes. Conversely, new contractors may find it challenging to enter the market, which could limit employment opportunities for some workers if competition decreases.

Expenses

There are potential financial implications for both the government and citizens. Service providers might face increased operational costs due to the obligation to honor existing employee terms and training needs. This could lead to higher bids for contracts, which may ultimately be passed down to consumers through increased prices for airport services. The government may also need to monitor and enforce compliance, leading to additional administrative expenses.

Proponents view

Supporters believe this amendment is necessary for protecting workers' rights and ensuring job security. They argue that maintaining continuity in employment reduces turnover, saving companies money on training and recruitment costs, which could ultimately lead to enhanced service quality for passengers.

Opponents view

Critics argue that the amendment could hinder competition among service providers, as the obligation to adhere to existing contracts could deter potential bidders from entering the market. They express concerns that it might create financial burdens for companies and limit their ability to innovate or improve services, potentially leading to inefficiencies and higher costs for both consumers and businesses.

Original Bill