National Security Review of Investments Modernization Act

Royal assent received

C-34
March 22, 2024 (10 months ago)
Canadian Federal
François-Philippe Champagne
Liberal
House of Commons
Royal assent
6 Votes
Full Title: An Act to amend the Investment Canada Act
National Security
Trade and Commerce
Economics

Summary

The National Security Review of Investments Modernization Act proposes changes to the Investment Canada Act to tighten national security reviews of foreign investments. It requires foreign investors to notify the government before investing, particularly in sensitive sectors, and allows the Minister of Industry to impose conditions if necessary. The bill aims to safeguard national interests but raises concerns about its impact on foreign investment and economic growth in Canada.

What it means for you

Groups that may be impacted include foreign investors, Canadian businesses seeking foreign partnerships, small companies, and startups, as well as government agencies tasked with implementing these regulations. Foreign investors may face more scrutiny and potential rejection of their investments, while Canadian firms that rely on foreign capital could suffer from reduced investment opportunities.

Expenses

The legislation could lead to increased costs associated with compliance for foreign investors, including fines of up to $500,000 for failure to notify the government of an investment. Smaller firms and startups may struggle with the administrative burdens and potential penalties, which could hinder their ability to innovate and stay competitive. On a broader scale, the government might incur additional expenses related to the enforcement and administration of heightened scrutiny.

Proponents view

Supporters argue that the amendments are essential for protecting national security, especially in an era of increasing foreign influence and geopolitical uncertainty. They believe the changes will prevent foreign entities from gaining control of critical sectors in Canada, ensuring that sensitive information and assets remain secure. By establishing clear guidelines and penalties, they contend that the bill will foster a more stable and protected investment environment.

Opponents view

Critics contend that the bill may deter legitimate foreign investment due to its stringent requirements and high penalties, which could create an unwelcoming environment for investors. They argue that the increased bureaucracy might stifle economic growth, innovation, and competitiveness in Canada, particularly for businesses reliant on foreign partnerships. Furthermore, the ambiguity in the application of the regulations could lead to inconsistent decisions, causing uncertainty that could further deter investment.

Original Bill

Votes

Vote 442

The information is not available at this time.

For (99%)
Paired (1%)
Vote 440

That, in relation to Bill C-34, An Act to amend the Investment Canada Act, not more than one further sitting day shall be allotted to the consideration of the report stage and one sitting day shall be allotted to the consideration at third reading stage of the said bill; and That, 15 minutes before the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders on the day allotted to the consideration at report stage and on the day allotted to the consideration at third reading stage of the said bill, any proceedings before the House shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this order, and in turn every question necessary for the disposal of the said stage of the bill then under consideration shall be put forthwith and successively, without further debate or amendment.

For (53%)
Against (46%)
Paired (1%)
Vote 443

The information is not available at this time.

For (43%)
Against (56%)
Paired (1%)
Vote 444

That Bill C-34, An Act to amend the Investment Canada Act, as amended, be concurred in at report stage with further amendments.

For (99%)
Paired (1%)
Vote 449

That the bill be now read a third time and do pass.

For (96%)
Paired (4%)
Vote 293

That the bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Industry and Technology.

For (98%)
Paired (2%)