Lowering Prices for Canadians Act

Close Icon

At report stage in the House of Commons

C-352
June 19, 2024 (7 months ago)
Canadian Federal
Jagmeet Singh
NDP
House of Commons
Third reading
1 Votes
Full Title: An Act to amend the Competition Act and the Competition Tribunal Act
Economics
Trade and Commerce

Summary

The "Lowering Prices for Canadians Act" proposes significant amendments to the Competition Act, aiming to enforce stricter penalties for anti-competitive practices and extend the review process for mergers from one year to three. The bill enables higher fines and possible imprisonment for offenders while expanding the scope of market examinations.

What it means for you

Consumers may benefit from potential lower prices and enhanced product offerings as competition is encouraged. However, small businesses and startups might feel the pressure of increased regulatory scrutiny and financial penalties, potentially impacting their ability to innovate and grow. Established corporations may also face higher operational costs, which could be passed on to consumers.

Expenses

The act could lead to increased compliance costs for businesses, as navigating the new regulations may require additional legal and administrative resources. This could affect pricing strategies, making goods and services more expensive in some cases. The heightened penalties mean that businesses could face fines of up to $35 million or more, and cost recovery for the Crown has been removed, transferring some financial risks to consumers through potential price hikes.

Proponents view

Supporters believe that the increased penalties will deter anti-competitive behavior, leading to a healthier marketplace. They argue that thorough market assessments will help maintain fair competition and ultimately benefit consumers by facilitating better prices and choices. The extended review period for mergers is seen as a safeguard against monopolies.

Opponents view

Critics worry that the bill's strong regulatory framework may stifle legitimate business practices and innovation, especially for small companies. They express concerns that the longer merger review timeframe could create uncertainty and delay economic growth by hindering potentially beneficial business combinations. Furthermore, the lack of cost recovery for legal actions against the Crown could reduce accountability and transparency in enforcement.

Original Bill

Votes

Vote 633

That the bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Industry and Technology.

For (54%)
Against (46%)