Taxing Carbon Smarter

Pause Icon

Outside the Order of Precedence

C-358
October 4, 2023 (a year ago)
Canadian Federal
Alex Ruff
Conservative
House of Commons
Third reading
0 Votes
Full Title: An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act (carbon pollution pricing)
Climate and Environment
Economics

Summary

The proposed amendment to the Excise Tax Act seeks to eliminate the Goods and Services Tax (GST) applied to carbon pollution pricing and related fees. This aims to provide financial relief to businesses and promote participation in carbon pricing, which is intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

What it means for you

This change could impact various groups differently. Businesses engaged in carbon markets may see reduced costs, potentially benefiting larger corporations that produce higher emissions. Regular consumers could experience lower prices if businesses pass on savings, but the removal of tax may not guarantee immediate benefits. Environmental advocates worry that the potential reduction in government funding could impact programs aimed at combating climate change, affecting the broader public.

Expenses

The removal of the GST could lead to significant shortfalls in government revenue, amounting to millions of dollars that would otherwise support public services and environmental initiatives. This shift might necessitate adjustments in government budgets and could lead to increased reliance on other taxes or cuts to essential services, which could affect citizens directly.

Proponents view

Supporters argue that eliminating the GST will lower costs for businesses, incentivizing them to adopt cleaner practices without the financial burden of taxes. They believe this could lead to increased investment in green technologies and innovations, ultimately supporting a transition to a low-carbon economy and contributing positively to climate goals.

Opponents view

Critics of the amendment contend that removing the GST from carbon pricing could undermine the government’s ability to fund crucial services and effectively combat climate change. They warn that this policy might disproportionately benefit larger corporations without ensuring accountability for emissions reductions. Additionally, opponents fear it may reduce the overall effectiveness of carbon pricing as a deterrent against carbon emissions, potentially sending the wrong message about the financial consequences of pollution.

Original Bill