Department of National Defence and Canadian Forces Ombud Act

Pause Icon

Outside the Order of Precedence

C-362
November 9, 2023 (a year ago)
Canadian Federal
Lindsay Mathyssen
NDP
House of Commons
Third reading
0 Votes
Full Title: An Act to establish the Office of the Ombud for the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Forces, to make related amendments to the Contraventions Act and to make consequential amendments to certain Acts
Labor and Employment
National Security

Summary

The Department of National Defence and Canadian Forces Ombud Act aims to create an Office of the Ombud focused on advocating for military personnel and their families. The Ombud will oversee complaints and grievances within the military, enhancing transparency and accountability. However, critics point to potential high costs and bureaucratic inefficiencies that may come with this new office.

What it means for you

Military personnel and their families may benefit from having a dedicated resource to address concerns and ensure their voices are heard. On the other hand, taxpayers and military members could feel the financial impact if operational costs divert funds from critical military needs.

Expenses

The establishment of the Ombud office will incur expenses related to salaries, operational costs, and administrative fees, which will be funded through Parliament appropriations. Critics argue these funds could instead support essential military functions, raising concerns about the overall budget impact on the Department of National Defence.

Proponents view

Supporters advocate for the Ombud office, believing it establishes a necessary mechanism for addressing grievances within the military framework. They argue that it will improve accountability and morale among service members, leading to better organizational integrity and fostering a culture of transparency.

Opponents view

Critics contend that the financial burden of the Ombud office may outweigh its benefits. They worry it could create bureaucratic hurdles and question whether existing complaint mechanisms could suffice. Furthermore, they express concerns about the potential of inefficient resource allocation that may detract from mission-critical operations within the military.

Original Bill