Department of Citizenship and Immigration Ombud Act

Pause Icon

Outside the Order of Precedence

C-399
June 13, 2024 (8 months ago)
Canadian Federal
Jenny Kwan
NDP
House of Commons
Third reading
0 Votes
Full Title: An Act to establish the Office of the Ombud for the Department of Citizenship and Immigration and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts
Immigration
Social Issues

Summary

The proposed Department of Citizenship and Immigration Ombud Act aims to create an Office of the Ombud, tasked with overseeing the immigration process, addressing complaints related to fairness and transparency, and ensuring government accountability. The Ombud would have a seven-year term and be appointed through a bipartisan process, receiving the same rank and powers as a deputy head of department.

What it means for you

This office could potentially impact individuals navigating Canada’s immigration system, especially those who feel wronged or discriminated against. Citizens and permanent residents may gain a direct avenue to address grievances regarding immigration practices, while employees within the Department may face new scrutiny regarding their actions.

Expenses

The establishment of the Ombud's office is likely to incur significant costs, including salary for the Ombud and any necessary staff. Additional expenses for travel, training, and operational needs are also anticipated. Critics express concern that funding this new entity may divert resources from other critical services within the immigration sector, leading to potential delays in processing times for applications and services.

Proponents view

Supporters argue that the Ombud's role would provide critical oversight, ensuring that systemic issues like bias and unfair treatment are addressed. They believe that investing in this independent watchdog could ultimately lead to reduced legal disputes and a fairer immigration process, fostering public trust in government operations. They contend that the operational costs would be outweighed by the long-term benefits of preventing broader injustices.

Opponents view

Critics caution against the increased government spending associated with setting up the Ombud's office. They argue that the resources used for this purpose might be better spent within the existing departments to directly improve services. There is also skepticism about the bureaucratic efficiency of an additional oversight layer that may complicate existing processes and burdensome complaints management, potentially leading to an overload system without guaranteeing effective outcomes.

Original Bill