The proposed amendments to the Criminal Code introduce new offenses against conversion therapy, which aims to change a person's sexual orientation or gender identity. Key changes include prohibiting the act of conversion therapy, taking minors outside Canada for this purpose, and stopping the promotion and material gains from these practices. Courts would also be able to remove related advertisements.
Groups directly impacted include LGBTQ+ individuals, particularly minors, who supporters believe will be protected from harmful practices. Mental health professionals might also be affected, as they could face scrutiny over their practices, and families may worry about their choices regarding therapy. Meanwhile, religious organizations or practitioners offering related services could find themselves at risk of legal consequences.
The financial implications of the bill involve potential increased costs for the government related to legal enforcement and compliance mechanisms, as well as court proceedings for those accused of conversion therapy. Mental health organizations could incur additional expenses if services are revised or if they need to adopt new practices. On the other hand, supporters argue that the overall long-term costs associated with mental health issues stemming from conversion therapy could decrease, benefiting public health systems.
Supporters argue that this legislation is vital for safeguarding vulnerable individuals from discredited and harmful practices linked to mental health issues. They believe it promotes societal acceptance and aligns with contemporary values of inclusion. By deterring conversion therapy through the proposed penalties, they feel the bill will ultimately protect individuals, particularly minors, and reduce mental health-related expenditures in the long run.
Critics contend the bill may inadvertently criminalize legitimate therapeutic practices aimed at identity exploration. They raise concerns about vague terminology that could lead to misinterpretation and enforcement against good-faith practices. Additionally, they worry about the potential stifling of free speech and discussions regarding gender and sexuality, as well as the financial burden of defending against accusations of conversion therapy. This could lead to increased legal costs for professionals and the government, burdening public resources.