Connected Care For Canadians Act

Close Icon

At second reading in the House of Commons

C-72
June 6, 2024 (8 months ago)
Canadian Federal
Mark Holland
Liberal
House of Commons
Third reading
0 Votes
Full Title: An Act respecting the interoperability of health information technology and to prohibit data blocking by health information technology vendors
Healthcare

Summary

The Connected Care for Canadians Act aims to improve the interoperability of health information technology and prohibits data blocking by vendors. This means that different healthcare systems will be able to share patient information more easily, potentially leading to better healthcare services and lower costs. However, it raises concerns about compliance costs for vendors and the potential impact on innovation and data security.

What it means for you

Patients could benefit from improved access to their health data, which can facilitate better communication between healthcare providers and enhance patient outcomes. Health technology vendors, especially smaller ones, may face challenges due to increased compliance obligations, resulting in possible cost increases for healthcare providers and, subsequently, for patients.

Expenses

The Act may lead to increased operational costs for health information technology vendors as they adapt to new compliance regulations. These costs could trickle down to healthcare providers, who might subsequently pass them on to patients through higher fees. Additionally, if vendors face penalties for non-compliance, this could result in financial strain on their operations, leading to concerns about the overall affordability of healthcare services.

Proponents view

Supporters argue that the Act is crucial for creating a more integrated healthcare system that enhances patient care and safety. They believe that by eliminating barriers to data exchange, healthcare providers can deliver timely and effective treatments, improving overall patient outcomes. Furthermore, proponents contend that strict regulations and penalties for non-compliance are necessary for ensuring accountability and protecting patient health data.

Opponents view

Critics express concerns over the potential financial burden on health vendors due to compliance costs that may be passed on to providers and patients, affecting affordability. They fear that the emphasis on interoperability could hinder innovation by enforcing rigid standards that may not accommodate the diverse needs of the healthcare market. Additionally, apprehensions about data security vulnerabilities arise from increased access to electronic health information, where broader sharing could expose sensitive data to breaches.

Original Bill