Electing Senate Leaders

Close Icon

Bill not proceeded with

S-226
November 24, 2021 (3 years ago)
Canadian Federal
Terry M. Mercer
Senate
Third reading
0 Votes
Full Title: An Act to amend the Constitution Act, 1867 and the Parliament of Canada Act (Speaker of the Senate)
Politics and Governance

Summary

The proposed amendments to the Constitution Act, 1867, and the Parliament of Canada Act aim to change how the Senate elects its Speaker and Deputy Speaker. Instead of being appointed by the Governor General, these positions would be filled through secret ballot elections among senators. This change is intended to increase accountability and democratic representation in the Senate.

What it means for you

The reforms could impact current and future senators, as they may have more agency in choosing their leaders. It may also affect citizens, especially those interested in more democratic processes within government institutions. Some groups may feel empowered by these changes, while others could worry about potential bias in elected leadership.

Expenses

Implementing elections for the Speaker and Deputy Speaker could lead to increased administrative costs for running the elections. This might mean additional financial burdens on the government, which could ultimately affect taxpayers. The potential increase in complexity within Senate operations could also result in unforeseen expenses.

Proponents view

Supporters argue that electing leadership positions fosters a more legitimate and independent Senate. They believe that allowing senators to vote for their leaders will enhance accountability and reduce political favoritism, making the Senate more democratic. This change could help restore public trust in the institution by promoting transparency and representation in leadership choices.

Opponents view

Critics express concern about the financial and practical implications of these amendments. They worry that introducing election processes for leadership roles may add additional costs and inefficiencies. There's skepticism about whether these changes will genuinely improve governance or merely alter political dynamics, potentially leading to partisanship in leadership selections rather than the impartiality expected from the Speaker's role.

Original Bill