Pathway to Citizenship

Close Icon

At second reading in the House of Commons

S-235
October 23, 2024 (3 months ago)
Canadian Federal
Mobina S.B. Jaffer
Senate
Third reading
0 Votes
Full Title: An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act
Social Issues
Social Welfare
Immigration

Summary

The bill seeks to amend the Citizenship Act by creating a pathway to citizenship for individuals who have spent time in child welfare or foster care in Canada and were not citizens at that time. These individuals can apply for citizenship if they have resided in Canada for a certain period and meet additional requirements.

What it means for you

This change primarily affects youth who have been in the child welfare system. Vulnerable young individuals could gain citizenship, which would grant them access to various rights and benefits available to citizens. Communities may see an increase in young residents who can fully participate in society, potentially enriching community dynamics.

Expenses

The bill may lead to increased social welfare spending as the government will likely incur costs associated with processing citizenship applications and supporting these individuals during their integration. Initial costs might rise due to administrative expenses and the implementation of new processes. However, supporters argue that investing in these youths could yield long-term economic benefits and reduce future social welfare dependency.

Proponents view

Supporters of the bill advocate for its humanitarian approach, emphasizing that it addresses the unique struggles of youth in the welfare system who have built their lives in Canada but lack citizenship. They believe that by granting citizenship, the bill fosters a sense of belonging, empowerment, and responsibility among these young individuals, potentially enhancing their contributions to society.

Opponents view

Critics caution that the bill could place additional strain on social services and immigration systems, creating inefficiencies and potential fraud. They are concerned about the ambiguous guidelines for verifying eligibility, which might lead to inconsistent application processing and administrative overhead. Opponents argue that the financial implications may outweigh the benefits, as increased spending on integration without rigorous checks could create vulnerabilities in the system.

Original Bill