Safeguarding Political Views

Close Icon

At second reading in the Senate

S-257
November 29, 2022 (2 years ago)
Canadian Federal
Salma Ataullahjan
Senate
Third reading
0 Votes
Full Title: An Act to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act (protecting against discrimination based on political belief)
Social Issues

Summary

The proposed amendment to the Canadian Human Rights Act seeks to expand discrimination protections to include political beliefs and activities. This change aims to safeguard individuals from discrimination based on their political views amid a growing concern for freedom of expression.

What it means for you

Individuals who hold minority political opinions, activists, or those engaged in political discourse may benefit from these protections. This could create a more inclusive environment for diverse viewpoints in workplaces, housing, and public life. However, those who fear that polarizing politics might further complicate relationships in communities could feel apprehensive.

Expenses

Implementing this amendment could lead to increased costs for the government, particularly regarding legal disputes and the management of complaints. Human rights commissions might require additional funding and resources to handle potential claims, creating budgetary pressures. Citizens may face increased legal fees if they decide to pursue discrimination claims against employers or service providers.

Proponents view

Supporters argue that this amendment is vital in protecting individuals who may face discrimination due to their political views, similar to existing protections based on race, religion, or sexuality. They believe that safeguarding political expression could promote greater civic engagement and participation in democratic processes, contributing to a healthier political climate.

Opponents view

Critics express concerns about the potential for financial strain and logistical hurdles in enforcing this amendment. They warn that an increase in discrimination claims could overwhelm the legal system, diverting attention from more severe discrimination issues. Additionally, there is apprehension that these protections could unintentionally suppress healthy political discourse, as individuals may feel hesitant to express differing opinions.

Original Bill