Modernizing Justice

Royal assent received

S-4
December 15, 2022 (2 years ago)
Canadian Federal
Marc Gold
Senate
Royal assent
0 Votes
Full Title: An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Identification of Criminals Act and to make related amendments to other Acts (COVID-19 response and other measures)
Criminal Justice
Technology and Innovation

Summary

The proposed amendments to the Criminal Code and related acts focus on modernizing law enforcement and judicial procedures through the use of telecommunications. Key changes include allowing electronic applications for search warrants, the option for remote court appearances, and streamlined processes for handling seized items and other judicial matters. Supporters claim these changes will increase efficiency and accessibility, while critics raise concerns about potential abuses of power and the erosion of civil liberties.

What it means for you

Individuals involved in the legal system, such as defendants, police officers, and victims, may be impacted by these procedural changes. Defendants might benefit from remote appearances and quicker resolutions to their cases, although they may face challenges regarding due process. Law enforcement may find ease in executing warrants and managing procedural documentation, while victims may experience frustration if they perceive a likelihood of diminished accountability for law enforcement actions.

Expenses

The amendments may lead to budgetary impacts, as the government will need to invest in technology for remote processes and training personnel for its use. Initial costs could be significant, raising concerns about the strain on resources that could otherwise benefit essential services in public safety and community support. Long-term operational savings may also be overestimated, potentially leading to further financial burdens if expected efficiencies do not materialize.

Proponents view

Supporters advocate for these amendments as crucial for modernizing the criminal justice system and improving accessibility. They argue that allowing remote applications and court appearances will streamline processes, reduce delays in the judicial system, and ultimately result in cost savings. Additionally, they assert that such changes will promote transparency and accountability in law enforcement practices.

Opponents view

Critics argue that the changes may compromise the integrity of judicial processes and civil liberties. There are concerns that reliance on technology could enable misuse of power among law enforcement, diminish the defendant's ability to fully engage with the legal process, and result in procedural oversights. They also warn of hidden financial burdens that may arise from implementing and maintaining new systems, diverting essential resources from more pressing needs within the justice system.

Original Bill