Canada Bans Fur Farming Nationwide

Summary#

This bill would ban fur farming across Canada. It makes it a crime to own or run a fur farm, to breed animals for fur farms, to kill fur‑bearing animals for commercial pelts, or to send animals to fur farms. Courts could impose fines, jail time, and orders about animal custody and restitution. The bill takes effect one year after it becomes law (Bill ss.3–5, 10).

• Bans owning or operating any fur farm (Bill s.3(a); s.2 “fur farm”).
• Bans breeding or inseminating animals for fur farms (Bill s.3(b)).
• Bans killing a fur‑bearing animal to use its pelt for commercial purposes (Bill s.3(c)).
• Bans giving, renting, selling, or transporting animals to fur farms (Bill s.3(d)).
• Sets penalties up to CAD $250,000 and 2 years in prison (indictable) or up to $50,000 and 6 months (summary) (Bill s.4).
• Allows forfeiture and transfer of animals, with priority to sanctuaries, shelters, or rescues (Bill ss.6–8).

What it means for you#

• Households

  • Canadian‑farmed fur would end one year after Royal Assent. The bill does not ban buying or selling fur products, or importing them (no such provisions in Bill s.3).
  • No change to non‑fur animal farming or to leather goods (not covered by the bill).

• Workers

  • Workers at fur farms and pelting operations would lose jobs when operations end. Timing: within one year after Royal Assent (Bill s.10). Data on worker counts: Data unavailable.
  • Courts may ban convicted persons from owning or living with animals for a set period (Bill s.5(a)).

• Businesses

  • Fur farms must cease operations by the in‑force date. Breeding for fur farms and killing animals for pelts for sale would be illegal (Bill s.3).
  • Shipping or selling animals to a fur farm would be illegal, including transport services (Bill s.3(d)).
  • Equipment and animals used in an offence may be seized and forfeited (Bill ss.6–7).
  • A compensation regime may be created by regulation, but the bill sets no amounts or timelines (Bill s.9).

• Trappers and harvesters

  • The bill bans “slaughter [of] a fur‑bearing animal to use its pelt for commercial purposes” (Bill s.3(c)). The bill does not define “fur‑bearing animal” or “slaughter.” This creates uncertainty about whether commercial use of pelts from wild‑caught animals is affected. No explicit exemptions are provided (Bill s.2; s.3).

• Animal shelters and sanctuaries

  • If animals are forfeited, the Minister must prioritize transferring them to sanctuaries, shelters, or rescues (Bill s.8(2)). No funding is specified for care or placement.

• Provinces and municipalities

  • The bill does not assign duties to provincial or municipal governments. Licensing or inspection programs for fur farms would be overtaken by the federal prohibitions once in force (Bill s.3). Coordination details: Data unavailable.

Expenses#

Estimated net cost: Data unavailable.

• No fiscal note or appropriation is included in the bill. Data unavailable.
• Potential federal costs, if regulations create a compensation regime for losses due to compliance (Bill s.9). Amounts and eligibility: Data unavailable.
• Possible enforcement and prosecution costs (investigations, court time, animal care during proceedings). Data unavailable.
• Fines for violations could generate revenue, but amounts depend on enforcement outcomes (Bill s.4). Data unavailable.
• Costs for transfer and care of forfeited animals are not specified (Bill s.8). Data unavailable.

Proponents' View#

• Ends fur farming and related breeding, which they argue reduces animal suffering and prevents inhumane confinement (Bill s.3(a)–(b)).
• Reduces disease risks linked to mink and other farmed fur‑bearing species, including zoonotic spillover documented during 2020‑2021 on mink farms (non‑partisan public health reporting; PHAC, 2020–2021).
• Creates clear national rules with criminal penalties, forfeiture, and court orders to deter non‑compliance (Bill ss.4–7).
• Provides a one‑year transition to wind down operations in an orderly way (Bill s.10).
• Allows the government to design compensation by regulation to address economic losses, which supporters view as a fair transition tool (Bill s.9).

Opponents' View#

• Scope ambiguity: “fur‑bearing animal” and “slaughter” are not defined. The ban on killing animals for commercial pelts (Bill s.3(c)) could be read to include wild‑caught animals, affecting trappers and Indigenous harvesters. The bill contains no explicit exemptions (Bill s.2; s.3).
• Economic impact: Immediate loss of farm assets, contracts, and jobs with no detailed compensation plan in the bill. Amount, eligibility, and timing depend on future regulations (Bill s.9). Data unavailable.
• Implementation risks: One year may be too short to wind down breeding cycles, place animals, and comply with contracts, increasing the risk of animal welfare issues and financial loss (Bill s.10). Data unavailable.
• Enforcement and capacity: Seizure and transfer of animals to sanctuaries could strain rescue capacity; the bill sets priority but no funding or standards for care (Bill s.8). Data unavailable.
• Policy trade‑off: The bill bans domestic farming but does not restrict imports or sales of fur products, which could shift production abroad rather than reduce demand (no import/sales provisions in Bill s.3). Assumption flagged.