Military Sexual Offence Trials Go Civilian

Summary#

This bill changes who prosecutes certain sexual offences by Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) members when the offences happen in Canada. It removes these cases from military courts and sends them to civilian courts. It applies to offences listed as “designated offences” in the Criminal Code (these are the sexual offences that trigger placement on the sex offender registry), and also to attempts and conspiracies to commit those offences (Bill, s.1; Criminal Code s.490.011(1)).

• Moves prosecutions for listed sexual offences committed in Canada from courts martial to civilian courts (Bill, s.1).
• Keeps prosecutions in military courts for sexual offences committed outside Canada (Bill, s.1 amending NDA s.130(1)(a) only).
• Ongoing military cases at the time the law takes effect will continue in the military system (Transitional Provision).
• Takes effect 1 year after Royal Assent (Coming into Force).

What it means for you#

• Households and victims/survivors:

  • If a CAF member is accused of a listed sexual offence in Canada, the case would be handled by civilian police and Crown prosecutors, and tried in civilian court. This may change available victim services, which follow provincial systems (Bill, s.1).
  • If your case was already before a military court when the law takes effect, it will stay in the military system until finished (Transitional Provision).

• CAF members and others subject to the Code of Service Discipline:

  • You would face civilian prosecution and sentencing for listed sexual offences committed in Canada. Military prosecution would no longer apply to those charges (Bill, s.1).
  • Alleged listed sexual offences outside Canada could still be prosecuted by military courts because the bill only removes jurisdiction for offences “that take place in Canada” (Bill, s.1; NDA s.130(1)(a)).

• Military justice system (military police, prosecutors, courts martial):

  • Courts martial would no longer try listed sexual offences committed in Canada. Resources could shift to other military-specific offences. Investigation processes are not specified by the bill; only prosecution forum changes (Bill, s.1).

• Civilian police, Crown prosecutors, and provincial/territorial courts:

  • You would receive and handle these cases once the law is in force. Workload may increase where CAF members live or work, including near bases (Bill, s.1). Data unavailable on volumes.

• Local and provincial governments:

  • Administration of justice (policing, prosecution, courts, victim services) may see added demand in jurisdictions with CAF presence. The bill sets no funding or implementation mandates (Bill text).

• Timing:

  • The change starts 1 year after Royal Assent. Cases already started in the military system before that date continue there (Transitional Provision; Coming into Force).

Expenses#

Estimated net cost: Data unavailable.

• The bill contains no appropriations, fines, fees, or tax changes (Bill text).
• It shifts cases from the military justice system to civilian systems. Any added provincial justice costs or federal defence savings are not quantified. Data unavailable.
• No official fiscal note identified. Data unavailable.

Proponents' View#

• Increases independence and public confidence by having civilian courts, not military courts, try sexual offences committed in Canada (Bill, s.1; Arbour IECR 2022).
• Aligns with recommendations from independent reviews to permanently move sexual offences to civilian jurisdiction to reduce real or perceived conflicts of interest (Arbour IECR 2022).
• Clarifies jurisdiction by removing courts martial from these cases in Canada, reducing parallel systems and forum disputes (Bill, s.1).
• Keeps ongoing cases stable and avoids restarting trials through a clear transition clause (Transitional Provision).
• Provides a 1‑year implementation window so CAF and provinces can set procedures and coordination before the change takes effect (Coming into Force).

Opponents' View#

• May strain provincial police, prosecutors, and courts in areas with large CAF populations, risking longer timelines for victims and accused. Data unavailable; past reviews noted uneven civilian capacity for military-related cases (Arbour IECR 2022).
• Creates a split system: sexual offences in Canada go to civilian courts, but those outside Canada may remain in military courts, leading to inconsistent handling based on location (Bill, s.1; NDA s.130(1)(a)–(b)).
• The bill does not set investigation rules, agreements, or funding for handoffs, so implementation could vary by province and delay cases unless formal protocols are in place (Bill text; Arbour IECR 2022).
• Transition clause means some victims will continue in the military system even after the law takes effect, which could be seen as unequal treatment across similar cases (Transitional Provision).