End Property Tests for Senators

Summary#

This bill changes the Constitution Act, 1867 to remove property and net worth requirements for most new and sitting Senators. It repeals the rule that Senators must have at least $4,000 in combined real and personal property and ends the land-ownership requirement for Senators from provinces other than Quebec (Clause 2; new s.23A via Clause 3). It also simplifies the declaration new Senators must sign (Clause 4). Special transition rules keep Quebec’s constitutional arrangements in place unless a broader repeal happens with Quebec’s consent (Preamble; Coordinating Amendments).

• Removes the $4,000 net worth requirement for all Senators by repealing s.23(4) (Clause 2).
• Ends the land-ownership requirement for Senators from provinces other than Quebec via new s.23A (Clause 3).
• Leaves Quebec’s property/residency-in-division rule unchanged unless paragraphs 23(3) and 23(6) are repealed by a separate constitutional amendment (Preamble; Coordinating Amendments).
• Replaces the lengthy property-based declaration with a simple qualification statement (Clause 4).
• Updates the vacancy rule in s.31(5) to remove “property” only if the broader repeal of s.23(3) and s.23(6) later occurs (Coordinating Amendments s.(5)).

What it means for you#

• Households

  • Appointments may draw from a wider pool of people. Renters and people without land in their province can be appointed as Senators outside Quebec once this law takes effect (Clause 3).
  • No direct change to taxes, services, or benefits. Effects are indirect through Senate composition. Data unavailable on downstream impacts.

• Prospective Senate appointees

  • No need to meet the $4,000 net worth requirement anywhere in Canada after the repeal of s.23(4) (Clause 2).
  • If appointed for a province other than Quebec, no need to own qualifying land in that province once new s.23A is in force (Clause 3).
  • Other constitutional qualifications, including residence in the province, still apply (s.23; s.31(5) until any later amendment).
  • The declaration you sign is simplified to “I am by law duly qualified to be appointed a member of the Senate of Canada” (Clause 4).

• Quebec appointees and residents

  • No immediate change to Quebec’s special rules tied to 24 Electoral Divisions. The real property/residency-in-division framework in s.23(6) remains unless a broader repeal of s.23(3) and s.23(6) is made with Quebec’s involvement, as noted by the Supreme Court (Preamble; Coordinating Amendments).

• Federal administrators

  • Must update forms and processes for the new declaration and qualification checks upon coming into force (Clause 4).
  • If a later repeal of s.23(3) and s.23(6) occurs, must also update vacancy procedures to reflect the new s.31(5) wording that removes “property” (Coordinating Amendments s.(5)).

Expenses#

Estimated net cost: Data unavailable.

• The bill makes constitutional changes to qualifications and forms. It includes no direct appropriations, taxes, or fees (Clauses 2–4; Coordinating Amendments).
• Administrative costs for updating forms and guidance are possible. Data unavailable.
• No official fiscal note identified. Data unavailable.

Proponents' View#

• Lowers barriers to service in the Senate by removing the $4,000 net worth test and land-ownership rule, which can exclude renters and people without access to qualifying property (Clause 2; Clause 3; Preamble).
• Aligns Senate qualifications with modern democratic values by ending property-based measures that are “no longer appropriate or relevant” to fitness for office (Preamble).
• Falls within Parliament’s authority to repeal s.23(4), and carefully respects Quebec’s constitutional position on s.23(3) by limiting changes outside Quebec (Preamble; Clause 3).
• Simplifies compliance and reduces paperwork by replacing the complex property declaration with a brief statement (Clause 4).
• Keeps residency as the enduring tie to a province, and updates the vacancy rule to focus on residence if the broader repeal later occurs (Coordinating Amendments s.(5)).

Opponents' View#

• Creates unequal rules among provinces during the transition: property requirements end for non-Quebec provinces but continue to affect Quebec’s framework until a separate repeal happens (Preamble; Clause 3; Coordinating Amendments).
• Weakens a traditional safeguard that tied Senators to their province through land ownership; critics argue this may reduce tangible regional ties (s.23(3) context; Clause 3). This assumes property ownership better ensures local rootedness; evidence not provided in the bill.
• Legal and administrative complexity from staged changes and contingencies, including coordination with any future repeal of s.23(3) and s.23(6) and the conditional update to s.31(5) (Coordinating Amendments).
• Removing the net worth test allows appointments regardless of personal finances; critics may question implications for independence or financial conflicts. This is an assumption; the bill provides no data on such effects (Clause 2).