Citizenship Path for Former Youth in Care

Summary#

This bill creates a direct path to Canadian citizenship for people who were in child welfare or foster care in Canada and were not citizens when they left care. It also pauses deportation for these applicants until the government makes a final decision on their citizenship application.

• Creates a new grant of citizenship for former children in care who meet specific residency and care-duration rules (Bill s.5.3(1)).
• Lets the Minister waive those rules on compassionate grounds after reviewing a person’s circumstances (Bill s.5.3(2)).
• Accepts an applicant’s written statement as proof of time in care unless the Minister can disprove it (Bill s.12(1.1)).
• Stops enforcement of a removal order against such applicants until a final decision is made (IRPA s.50(c.1)).
• Covers many care settings, including foster homes, group homes, psychiatric or addictions facilities, and services provided by provincial child protection agencies (Bill s.5.3(1)(a)-(c)).

What it means for you#

• Households and former youth in care

  • Eligibility: You can apply for citizenship if you left child welfare/foster care in Canada, were ordinarily resident in Canada that day (usual home), and were not a citizen then (Bill s.5.3(1)).
  • Care history: You must have spent at least 365 days in one or more covered care situations (Bill s.5.3(1)(d)(iii)).
  • Physical presence: You must have been physically in Canada at least 1,095 days before you apply (Bill s.5.3(1)(d)(ii)).
  • Time abroad after 18: You must not have lived outside Canada for more than 10 years since turning 18 (Bill s.5.3(1)(d)(iv)).
  • When care ended: You generally must have moved to independence rather than back to a parent when care ended, unless that return to a parent happened within 365 days after you turned 18 (Bill s.5.3(1)(d)(i)).
  • Proof: Your written statement about your time in care counts as proof unless the Minister shows, on a balance of probabilities, that it did not happen (Bill s.12(1.1)).
  • Compassionate waiver: The Minister may waive any of the above requirements in paragraph (1)(d) based on your circumstances (Bill s.5.3(2)).
  • Deportation pause: If you have a removal order, it cannot be enforced while your application under this section is pending, until a final decision is made (IRPA s.50(c.1)).
  • Application window: The bill sets no filing deadline. Data unavailable on processing times.

• Service providers and counsel

  • New statutory route: You can file under the new Citizenship Act s.5.3 for eligible clients (Bill s.5.3).
  • Evidence handling: Client affidavits or written statements trigger a presumption that time-in-care occurred unless the department disproves it (Bill s.12(1.1)).
  • Removals: Filing under s.5.3 triggers a stay of removal until a final decision (IRPA s.50(c.1)).

• Provincial/territorial child welfare agencies

  • No new statutory duties are created. The Minister may still seek records to test or rebut applicant statements; the bill does not specify procedures or funding. Data unavailable.

• Employers and schools

  • No direct obligations. Some non-citizen former youth in care may gain citizenship if eligible, which may affect individual access to roles or programs that require citizenship. Data unavailable.

Expenses#

Estimated net cost: Data unavailable.

• No explicit appropriations, fees, or revenue changes appear in the bill text (Bill, passim).
• No publicly released fiscal note identified for program administration or enforcement changes. Data unavailable.
• Eligible population size and expected application volume: Data unavailable.

Proponents' View#

• Closes a protection gap for former children in state care by requiring the Minister to grant citizenship when clear, measurable criteria are met (Bill s.5.3(1); Preamble).
• Reduces the risk of deportation for people who grew up in Canadian care by pausing removal while their citizenship application is decided (IRPA s.50(c.1)).
• Lowers documentation barriers by accepting an applicant’s written statement as proof of time in care unless disproved, which can help when records are incomplete (Bill s.12(1.1)).
• Uses objective ties to Canada—at least 1,095 days of presence and 365 days in care—to focus relief on people with established connections (Bill s.5.3(1)(d)(ii)-(iii)).
• Allows compassionate waivers of rigid rules to avoid excluding deserving cases (Bill s.5.3(2)).
• Aligns with Canada’s commitments under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and with the state’s in loco parentis responsibility for children in its care (Preamble).

Opponents' View#

• Evidence standard may invite unsupported claims or increase verification burdens because the government must disprove an applicant’s written statement to reject it (Bill s.12(1.1)).
• The automatic stay of removal upon application could be used to delay enforcement actions, adding to backlogs until a final decision is issued (IRPA s.50(c.1)). Scale of impact: Data unavailable.
• Creates unequal treatment by giving a special path to citizenship for former youth in care while others who arrived as minors but were not in care must use standard routes. Effects on fairness and consistency: Data unavailable.
• Ambiguities (for example, the exception tied to returning to a parent within 365 days after turning 18) may lead to disputes and litigation over eligibility (Bill s.5.3(1)(d)(i)).
• Implementation may require coordination and record checks with provincial agencies, but the bill provides no process details or funding, which could strain administration. Costs and timelines: Data unavailable.