Back to Bills

Major Plan for Long-Duration Grid Storage

Full Title:
Energy Storage Planning for Investment Act

Summary#

This bill directs Alberta to plan how to use energy storage to make the power grid cheaper, more reliable, and cleaner. It also launches a plan to grow the battery supply chain in the province and creates a task force on long-duration energy storage.

  • Requires a province-wide energy storage plan within 12 months, focused on “storage as a service,” long-duration storage (8+ hours), and better ways to compare storage with building new power lines.
  • Sets goals to lower electricity costs, improve reliability, add low-cost, low-emissions energy, and attract private investment.
  • Orders a battery supply chain plan within 12 months, with concrete program measures and yearly public progress reports.
  • Creates a Long Duration Energy Storage Task Force (7–10 members) within 3 months to recommend how to remove barriers, support research and commercialization, and adjust market and approval rules; report due within 2 years.
  • Requires consultation with Alberta’s system operator, utilities regulator, Indigenous Peoples, academics, and others, and a review of what other regions are doing.

What it means for you#

  • Electricity customers

    • No immediate change to your bill. The province will plan first.
    • Over time, storage could reduce the need for costly new lines, which can help limit future rate increases.
    • Utilities may pay for storage services and recover some costs through rates, so savings will depend on how well projects perform.
  • Reliability and outages

    • Storage can help cover peak hours, ease local bottlenecks, and keep power steady during sudden changes in supply or demand.
    • Long-duration storage aims to bridge longer gaps, such as calm or cloudy periods.
  • Homeowners, farmers, and small businesses with solar or batteries

    • The plan will look at simpler rules for small and pooled (aggregated) storage to join programs and get paid for services like reducing peak demand.
    • Aggregator contracts could make it easier to participate without owning large systems.
  • Businesses and investors

    • Clearer rules and competitive bidding for “energy storage as a service” may create new contracts and revenue streams.
    • The battery supply chain plan could support mining, processing, component manufacturing, and recycling, opening opportunities across Alberta.
  • Electric utilities

    • Guidance to compare storage and other non-wire options with traditional wires upgrades and to choose the lower-cost path when feasible.
    • Options for cost recovery and shared-savings or performance incentives tied to storage projects.
  • Indigenous communities

    • The bill calls for early, ongoing, and transparent engagement.
    • It aims to support Indigenous participation in storage projects and related economic opportunities.
  • Local governments and communities

    • Some areas may see fewer or deferred power line expansions if storage can solve local needs.
    • Communities may receive proposals for storage sites, with related permitting and engagement processes.

Expenses#

No publicly available information.

Proponents' View#

  • Clear, coordinated planning will reduce uncertainty and make Alberta more attractive for private investment in storage and batteries.
  • Using storage to delay or avoid expensive new wires can save money for ratepayers.
  • Storage can improve grid reliability during peak times and extreme weather.
  • Better integration of wind and solar can provide low-cost power and reduce emissions without building as many new lines or backup plants.
  • A battery supply chain strategy could create jobs in mining, processing, manufacturing, and recycling.
  • Competitive, transparent procurement and required engagement with Indigenous Peoples improve fairness and trust.

Opponents' View#

  • Adds new planning layers and a task force, which could create bureaucracy and administrative costs without clear benefits.
  • Letting utilities recover storage costs through rates could raise bills if promised savings do not appear.
  • Preferring non-wire options might slow needed grid expansions or shift technical risks onto customers.
  • Government may be steering the market toward certain technologies, which could crowd out private decision-making.
  • Efforts to build a battery supply chain may require subsidies and carry environmental concerns around mining and recycling.
  • More complex rules and procurement steps could slow projects and delay results.