Summary#

This bill would require the federal Minister of Finance to create a national framework for a “guaranteed livable basic income” (GLBI) for people in Canada age 18 and over. It does not create a basic income program or pay anyone money now. It sets rules for how a future program should be designed and reported to Parliament (s.3–5).

• Covers “any person over the age of 17,” including temporary workers, permanent residents, and refugee claimants (s.3(1)).
• Requires consultations with provinces, Indigenous elders and governing bodies, and other stakeholders (s.3(2)).
• Sets design rules: region-based livable amounts; no work or school requirement to qualify; no cuts to exceptional disability or health supports (s.3(3)(a)-(d)).
• Requires a public framework report within 1 year of the Act taking effect, and annual effectiveness reviews after 2 years (s.4–5).
• Creates national standards to guide provinces on related health and social supports (s.3(3)(b)).
• Publishes reports online after tabling in Parliament (s.4(2)).

What it means for you#

• Households

  • No immediate payments or tax changes. The bill orders planning and reporting only (s.3–5).
  • If a GLBI is later created under this framework, adults 18+ could qualify even if they are students, unemployed, or working (s.3(1), s.3(3)(c)).
  • The framework must prevent cuts to benefits that meet exceptional health or disability needs (s.3(3)(d)).

• Workers and job seekers

  • No work, training, or school requirement would be allowed as a condition for a future GLBI under this framework (s.3(3)(c)).
  • No change to Employment Insurance or other programs at this stage. The bill does not amend existing benefits.

• Persons with disabilities and people with high health needs

  • The framework must protect specialized supports from being reduced if a GLBI is implemented (s.3(3)(d)).
  • No immediate change to current disability programs.

• Indigenous peoples and communities

  • Indigenous elders and Indigenous governing bodies must be consulted in building the framework (s.3(2)).
  • No direct program change now; the framework would shape future design.

• Provinces and territories

  • Required to be consulted across health, disability, education, and social development (s.3(2)).
  • Would receive “national standards” to guide how supports complement a GLBI (s.3(3)(b)). The bill does not force provinces to fund or deliver a program.

• Businesses and employers

  • No direct obligations or costs in this bill.

• Timeline and transparency

  • Framework report due within 1 year after the Act takes effect, then posted online within 10 days after tabling in both Houses (s.4).
  • Effectiveness review due within 2 years after the first report is tabled, then annually (s.5).

Expenses#

Estimated net cost: Data unavailable.

• The bill creates no cash benefits, taxes, or fees. It mandates development of a framework and recurring reports (s.3–5).
• No appropriations are included in the bill text. Data unavailable on expected administrative costs.
• Any future GLBI costs would depend on choices not set here (benefit level, phase-out rate, eligibility, and how provincial programs interact). This bill does not define those parameters (s.3(3)).

Proponents' View#

• Builds a clear path toward reducing poverty and improving health and education outcomes by requiring a national GLBI framework and public reporting (Preamble; s.4–5).
• Ensures broad inclusion: adults 18+ including temporary workers, permanent residents, and refugee claimants are in scope (s.3(1)).
• Protects people with disabilities by forbidding cuts to exceptional health/disability supports if a GLBI is implemented (s.3(3)(d)).
• Reduces barriers by banning work, training, or school requirements for eligibility under the framework (s.3(3)(c)).
• Matches benefit levels to real costs of living in each region, improving adequacy (s.3(3)(a)).
• Requires consultation with provinces and Indigenous governing bodies, which may improve policy fit and uptake (s.3(2)).

Assumptions noted: Benefits to poverty and health depend on later governments adopting and funding a program; this bill only sets the framework.

Opponents' View#

• Risks federal overreach into provincial areas (health, social services) by setting national standards that “guide” provincial implementation, which could cause intergovernmental conflict or duplication (s.3(3)(b)).
• Commits to no work or school requirement, which critics argue could reduce work effort; the bill does not require a labour market impact assessment before setting standards (s.3(3)(c)).
• Could set expectations for a costly program without defining funding sources or caps; the bill offers no fiscal guardrails. Data unavailable for cost magnitude in this bill.
• The promise not to reduce disability/health supports may be difficult to enforce across jurisdictions; the bill includes no enforcement tools or penalties (s.3(3)(d)).
• Broad eligibility, including non-citizens, may raise administrative complexity; the bill does not define residency duration or verification rules (s.3(1)).
• Timeline risk: Defining region-specific “livable” amounts and national standards within 1 year may strain capacity, risking delays or a framework that is too general to guide implementation (s.3(3)(a)-(b), s.4(1)).

Assumptions noted: Cost and work-impact concerns presume a generous, widely available GLBI; this bill does not set benefit levels or implement the program.