Back to Bills

Protect Political Beliefs in Federal Jobs and Services

Full Title: An Act to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act (protecting against discrimination based on political belief)

Summary#

This bill adds “political belief or activity” to the Canadian Human Rights Act’s list of prohibited grounds of discrimination. It updates the Act’s purpose clause and the core definition of prohibited grounds. The change applies only to matters under federal jurisdiction (Section 2). It does not define “political belief” or “political activity.”

  • Adds “political belief or activity” to the prohibited grounds for all purposes of the Act (Clause 2; Subsection 3(1)).
  • Updates the purpose clause to include protection from discrimination based on political belief or activity (Clause 1; Section 2).
  • Applies only to areas within Parliament’s authority, not to provincial or territorial matters (Section 2).
  • No delayed effective date appears in the text.
  • No new programs, taxes, or fees are specified.

What it means for you#

  • Households and individuals:

    • If you use federal programs or services, you could file a human rights complaint if you are treated unfairly because of your political belief or political activity, once the bill takes effect (Clause 2; Subsection 3(1); Section 2).
    • The bill does not define “political belief” or “political activity,” so how far protection reaches would be decided under existing complaint processes and case law. Data unavailable.
  • Workers and job seekers:

    • If you work for, or apply to, a federal public body or a federally regulated employer, you gain protection from discrimination based on political belief or political activity (Clause 2; Subsection 3(1); Section 2).
    • Examples of covered settings include only those under federal jurisdiction; areas under provincial employment law are not covered by this Act (Section 2).
  • Businesses and employers under federal jurisdiction:

    • You would need to review hiring, discipline, and workplace policies to ensure they do not discriminate based on political belief or political activity (Clause 2; Subsection 3(1)).
    • Training and complaint-handling processes may need updates. Data unavailable.
  • Governments and agencies under federal jurisdiction:

    • Service delivery standards and staff guidance may need updates to prevent discrimination on this new ground (Clause 2; Subsection 3(1)).
    • The bill text does not change enforcement mechanisms in the Act. Data unavailable.

Expenses#

Estimated net cost: Data unavailable.

  • The bill contains no direct appropriations, taxes, or fees (Bill text; Clauses 1–2).
  • Potential administrative impacts on federal bodies that handle human rights complaints: Data unavailable.
  • No official fiscal note identified: Data unavailable.

Proponents' View#

  • It closes a gap by clearly protecting people from discrimination based on political belief or participation in political activity within federal jurisdiction (Clause 2; Subsection 3(1)).
  • It aligns the Act’s purpose with equal opportunity that includes political belief or activity, making the law clearer and easier to apply (Clause 1; Section 2).
  • It may reduce punishment or exclusion from jobs or services due to lawful political views or activities, which supporters say strengthens democratic participation (Clause 2; Subsection 3(1)). Assumption: effects depend on future case outcomes.
  • It uses existing Canadian Human Rights Act processes, so supporters expect limited implementation burden. Data unavailable.

Opponents' View#

  • The bill does not define “political belief” or “political activity,” which could create uncertainty, uneven rulings, and more litigation until tribunals set boundaries (Bill text; Clauses 1–2).
  • It could conflict with workplace rules on impartiality or conduct in certain roles, making management and discipline harder, especially for publicly facing or security-sensitive jobs. Assumption: impact depends on case law and policies.
  • It may increase the number or complexity of complaints to federal bodies, raising costs or delays. Data unavailable.
  • Coverage is limited to federal matters, which may cause public confusion because most workplaces are under provincial law (Section 2).

Timeline

Nov 29, 2022 • Senate

First reading

Nov 26, 2024 • Senate

Second reading

Social Issues
Labor and Employment