Back to Bills

Candidates Must Disclose Serious Ethics Penalties

Full Title:
The Elections Amendment Act

Summary#

This Manitoba bill changes the Elections Act to add a new disclosure rule for people running for office who are or were Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs). Its goal is to give voters clear information about serious past breaches of conflict-of-interest rules.

  • Requires current or former MLAs who run for election to include a signed statement in their nomination papers if the Ethics Commissioner found they broke the conflict-of-interest law and the Assembly ordered a penalty.
  • The rule applies only in serious cases where the Assembly ordered a fine, a suspension from sitting and voting, or that the MLA’s seat be declared vacant.
  • Takes effect on the day it becomes law and applies to any election after that, without the usual 90‑day waiting period.
  • Makes a small wording fix in the English version of the nomination requirements.

What it means for you#

  • Voters

    • You may get more direct information about whether a current or former MLA running again was found to have broken conflict-of-interest rules in a serious way.
    • This can help you judge a candidate’s record before you vote.

  • Current or former MLAs who run for office

    • You must add a statement to your nomination papers saying whether the Ethics Commissioner ruled that you broke the conflict-of-interest law in a case where the Assembly also ordered a fine, suspension, or loss of seat.
    • If no such ruling and penalty exist, you would state that as well.

  • Other candidates (who have never been MLAs)

    • No change to your nomination paperwork from this bill.

  • Elections administrators

    • Will update nomination forms and check for the new statement when candidates file.

Expenses#

Estimated cost: likely minimal administrative costs to update forms and process disclosures.

  • One-time updates to nomination forms and guidance for candidates.
  • Minor staff time to review the added statement in candidate filings.
  • No new programs, offices, or ongoing funding are created by the bill.

Proponents' View#

  • Increases transparency so voters can see serious past conflict-of-interest violations by people seeking office.
  • Focuses only on major cases that led to formal penalties by the Assembly, not minor complaints.
  • Simple to follow and low-cost, since it adds just one statement to existing nomination paperwork.
  • Applies right away so the next elections benefit from the added disclosure.

Opponents' View#

  • Singles out current and former MLAs, not other public figures, which some may see as uneven treatment.
  • Duplicates information that may already be public and could confuse voters without full context.
  • Could be used for political attacks, since it highlights past penalties without explaining details.
  • Immediate effect may catch some candidates off guard if they do not know about the new requirement.