Back to Bills

Sign Languages Legally Recognized

Full Title:
The Sign LanguagesRecognition Act

Summary#

This Manitoba law recognizes sign languages as real, distinct languages. It says they are the primary way many Deaf and Deaf-Blind people in the province communicate. The law took effect when it was approved.

  • Recognizes American Sign Language (ASL), Quebec Sign Language (LSQ), Indigenous sign languages, and tactile sign languages.
  • States these are primary languages for Deaf and Deaf-Blind communities in Manitoba.
  • Does not create new programs, services, or funding in the text of the law.
  • Aligns Manitoba with other places that formally recognize sign languages.

What it means for you#

  • Deaf and Deaf-Blind residents: Your main languages—ASL, LSQ, Indigenous sign languages, and tactile sign languages—are officially recognized by the province. Day-to-day services do not automatically change under this law.
  • Families, friends, and coworkers: The province affirms that sign languages are real languages, which may encourage more learning and use. There are no new training or certification rules in this law.
  • Schools and public services: The law is symbolic and guiding. It does not require new services, curricula, or interpreters by itself.
  • Employers and businesses: No new legal duties are created by this law. It may shape future policies on accessibility and inclusion.
  • Indigenous communities: Indigenous sign languages are named and recognized, which may support cultural identity and awareness.
  • General public: The law aims to raise awareness and respect for sign languages used in Manitoba.

Expenses#

No publicly available information.

Proponents' View#

  • Recognition shows respect for Deaf culture and identity.
  • It can raise public awareness and reduce stigma by affirming that sign languages are full languages.
  • Aligns Manitoba with federal and other jurisdictions that recognize sign languages.
  • May support future improvements in accessibility by setting a clear, shared understanding.
  • Naming Indigenous and tactile sign languages helps include often overlooked groups.

Opponents' View#

  • The law is mostly symbolic and does not guarantee interpreters, services, or funding.
  • Without clear duties for schools, health care, or courts, everyday access may not improve.
  • Could create confusion if people assume new rights or services that the law does not provide.
  • Some say broader accessibility changes should be paired with recognition to have real impact.