Back to Bills

Revive Julian Pepper Capital Inc.

Full Title:
Bill PR52, Julian Pepper Capital Inc. Act, 2026

Summary#

  • This bill brings back a single private company in Ontario: Julian Pepper Capital Inc.

  • The company was voluntarily closed in June 2025. The owner asked the Legislature to revive it so it can do business again.

  • Revives Julian Pepper Capital Inc. as if it had never been dissolved.

  • Restores the company’s property, rights, and privileges. Also restores its debts and other obligations.

  • Protects any rights other people gained after the company was dissolved.

  • Takes effect once it receives Royal Assent.

What it means for you#

  • Most people

    • No direct impact. This bill affects only one company.

  • Customers, suppliers, or partners of Julian Pepper Capital Inc.

    • Old contracts and agreements may be active again, unless someone else gained rights while the company was closed.
    • You can once again do business with the company under its old name.

  • Creditors (people or companies owed money by Julian Pepper Capital Inc.)

    • You can pursue payment again because the company is treated as if it was never shut down.

  • Owner and any future employees of Julian Pepper Capital Inc.

    • The business can operate again under the same corporate identity.

  • Government and regulators

    • The company returns to active status for filings, taxes, and compliance, as if the dissolution had not happened.

Expenses#

Estimated public cost: minimal, limited to routine administrative work.

  • No new programs, grants, or tax changes.
  • Small administrative costs to pass the bill and update corporate records.

Proponents' View#

  • Lets the owner continue business without starting a brand-new company.
  • Restores certainty for customers, suppliers, and creditors tied to past contracts.
  • Fixes a closure that the owner no longer wants, with little to no cost to taxpayers.
  • Narrow scope: affects only one company, not the wider market.

Opponents' View#

  • Uses Legislative time for a private matter with limited public interest.
  • Could create confusion about deals made while the company was dissolved.
  • Revives old debts and obligations, which some may see as risky or unfair to current stakeholders.
  • Sets a precedent that private bills may be used when administrative options might exist.