Back to Bills

Financial Crimes Agency Act

Full Title:
An Act to establish the Financial Crimes Agency and to make consequential amendments to certain Acts and regulations

Summary#

Bill C-29 creates a new federal law enforcement agency, the Financial Crimes Agency (FCA), under the Minister of Finance. Its main job is to investigate serious and complex financial crimes and help recover proceeds of crime (money or assets gained from crime). It also updates many laws so the new agency can share information, use policing powers, and be subject to access-to-information and privacy rules.

Key changes:

  • Establishes the FCA, led by a Commissioner (a deputy head-level post and peace officer), with head office in the National Capital Region and possible regional offices.
  • Authorizes the FCA to investigate “financial crimes,” including money laundering, proceeds-of-crime offences, offences under the anti–money laundering law, and crimes involving digital assets or financial markets.
  • Lets the Commissioner designate some employees as investigations officers and, by regulation, some as police officers with full peace officer powers.
  • Requires a formal arrangement with the RCMP to provide services and assistance to the FCA.
  • Allows the Attorney General of Canada to conduct prosecutions of financial crimes investigated by the FCA and, by issuing a “fiat,” take exclusive carriage of a case in a province in specified circumstances (for example, transnational or multi‑province cases).
  • Expands lawful information sharing with the FCA across several laws, including sanctions laws, national security information, immigration biometrics, employment and social development data, and citizenship status.
  • Creates a public complaints process for the conduct of FCA employees designated as police officers, first via an entity set by regulation, then under the Public Complaints and Review Commission when that law comes into force.
  • Requires an annual report and a five‑year legislative review.

What it means for you#

  • Businesses in financial services and markets (banks, fintech, crypto platforms, securities firms)
    • You could face more federal investigations, requests for records, and asset seizure or restraint actions under existing laws.
    • The bill itself does not create new compliance duties for private firms, but enforcement attention would likely increase in serious and complex cases.
  • Individuals suspected of financial crime
    • Greater likelihood of federal investigation and recovery of assets tied to crime.
    • Your case could be prosecuted by the Attorney General of Canada, especially if it spans provinces, crosses borders, or engages the national interest.
  • People whose biometrics are collected under immigration law
    • Your biometric and related personal information may be retained, used, disclosed, and disposed of by the FCA if it is provided to the FCA for its mandate (rules to be set in regulations).
  • Members of the public interacting with FCA police officers
    • You will be able to file complaints about the conduct of FCA employees designated as police officers. Complaints will be reviewed by a body set in regulation at first, and later by the Public Complaints and Review Commission once that law is in force.
  • Provincial governments and police services
    • Expect collaboration on investigations. In some cases, the Attorney General of Canada may assume exclusive conduct of a prosecution by issuing a fiat.
  • Federal departments and agencies (e.g., Global Affairs, CSIS, OSFI, IRCC, ESDC)
    • Clearer authorities to share information with the FCA for sanctions administration, national security information disclosure, immigration biometrics, employment/social data, and citizenship status.
  • Taxpayers
    • A new federal agency will be created and staffed. This will require public funding; no amounts are provided in the materials.

Note on timing:

  • Some parts take effect at royal assent, some on the first anniversary of royal assent, and some when sections of the Public Complaints and Review Commission Act take effect. Exact dates are not fully clear from the supplied text.

Expenses#

The bill will require new public spending to set up and run the agency; no cost estimate is provided in the available material.

  • Start-up: hiring the Commissioner and staff, setting up offices and systems, equipment and specialized investigative tools.
  • Ongoing: salaries, training (including for police-designated staff), digital forensics, legal support, case management, and reporting.
  • RCMP support: costs tied to the mandatory assistance arrangement (details not provided).
  • Oversight: costs to run the complaints review process and to produce annual and five‑year reviews.
  • Potential offsets: more recovery of proceeds of crime could return funds to the Crown, but no projections are provided.

Proponents' View#

  • The bill appears intended to build specialized capacity to tackle complex money laundering, sanctions evasion, market manipulation, and other financial crimes, including those involving digital assets.
  • Centralizing expertise and allowing the FCA to designate police officers could improve the speed and quality of investigations and asset recovery.
  • The Attorney General of Canada’s ability to lead prosecutions in FCA cases could ensure consistent handling of transnational or multi‑province crimes and matters of national interest.
  • Expanded, explicit information‑sharing authorities (sanctions, national security disclosures, immigration biometrics, social program data) could reduce barriers that currently slow or limit investigations.
  • Mandatory cooperation with the RCMP could avoid duplication and let the FCA leverage existing federal policing capabilities.
  • Annual reporting and a five‑year review could support transparency and course corrections.

Opponents' View#

  • One concern is prosecutorial centralization: allowing the Attorney General of Canada to take exclusive carriage of some cases may raise questions about provincial roles in prosecutions.
  • The Minister of Finance may direct the FCA Commissioner on matters that affect public policy or strategic direction. Even though directions must be made public, this could raise concerns about the perceived independence of investigations.
  • The Commissioner has wide human‑resources powers and is exempt from some usual public service controls. This may prompt questions about workforce governance and consistency with broader public service practices.
  • Expansive information‑sharing and the FCA’s authority to handle immigration biometrics may raise privacy concerns. Key protections will depend on regulations that are not yet available.
  • Creating a new agency likely entails significant costs. Without a fiscal plan in the supplied materials, it is unclear how resources will be phased in and whether there will be overlaps with existing RCMP or other agencies.
  • The criteria for focusing on “serious and complex” cases are set by the Commissioner and are not detailed in the bill. This could lead to uncertainty about which cases the FCA will pursue.
  • Oversight of FCA police-designated employees starts with an entity created by regulation before shifting to the Public Complaints and Review Commission. Until the transition is complete, there may be questions about consistency and robustness of oversight.

What is unclear:

  • Detailed costs, staffing levels, and rollout timelines.
  • The exact start dates for some sections, based on the partial coming-into-force details provided.
  • The planned criteria for designating employees as police officers and for selecting cases.