Back to Bills

Steady Transit Grants from Fuel Tax

Full Title:
Dedicated Funding for Public Transportation Act

Summary#

  • This bill sets up a steady pot of money for public transit in Nova Scotia, starting in 2026.
  • It takes a set slice of the existing gasoline and diesel tax and gives it to municipalities as yearly transit grants. Towns must put in matching money to qualify.
  • Cities also get extra bonuses if they grow ridership above 2025 levels and if they build bus‑only lanes or other transit‑only corridors.

Key changes and impacts:

  • Dedicates an amount equal to 2 cents per litre of gasoline and diesel sold in the prior year to municipal transit grants.
  • Grants are shared using a formula: 70% based on last year’s ridership and 30% on population.
  • To qualify, a municipality must match the grant dollar‑for‑dollar and that matched amount must be higher than what it budgeted for transit in 2025–26.
  • Adds a ridership growth bonus: $1 for every extra trip compared with 2025 (one origin‑to‑destination trip counts as one trip, even with transfers).
  • Adds a transit right‑of‑way bonus: increases a city’s total grant by 1% for each kilometre of dedicated transit‑only lane or corridor.
  • Funds can be used for both capital (buses, bus lanes, shelters) and operating costs (drivers, maintenance).
  • Starts January 1, 2026; funding amounts are tied to fuel tax paid in the prior fiscal year and still must be approved in the provincial budget.

What it means for you#

  • Transit riders

    • More stable funding could mean more frequent service, longer hours, newer buses, and better routes over time.
    • Cities that add bus‑only lanes may see faster, more reliable trips.
    • If your city grows ridership, the $1‑per‑extra‑trip bonus can be reinvested in service.
  • Municipal governments

    • You must match the provincial grant dollar‑for‑dollar, and your matched amount must be above your 2025–26 transit budget level.
    • Funding is allocated 70% by ridership and 30% by population, so higher‑ridership systems get more, but smaller places still receive a share.
    • You can use the money for operating needs or capital projects.
    • If you add dedicated transit‑only corridors, your total grant rises by 1% per kilometre (for example, 10 km = 10% bonus).
    • You will need to report ridership data; the Province may use standard data from the Canadian Urban Transit Association.
  • Drivers

    • No new fuel tax is created. The bill earmarks part of the existing gasoline and diesel tax for transit.
    • Over time, better transit could ease traffic in busy areas.
  • Taxpayers

    • Because cities must match the grants and increase their own transit spending above 2025–26 levels, some municipalities may shift budgets or raise local revenues to participate.

Expenses#

Annual funding level: equal to 2 cents per litre of gasoline and diesel sold in the prior year (from existing fuel tax revenue; not a new tax).

  • The total will vary with how much fuel is sold each year.
  • Grants, the $1‑per‑trip growth bonus, and the right‑of‑way bonus are paid only if approved in the provincial budget.
  • Municipalities must contribute an amount equal to their grant, above their 2025–26 transit spending.

Proponents' View#

  • Provides stable, predictable funding so cities can plan routes, staffing, and fleet purchases with confidence.
  • Rewards growth in ridership, pushing agencies to improve service and attract more riders.
  • Encourages faster service through bus‑only lanes and other dedicated corridors.
  • Uses an existing tax stream instead of creating a new tax.
  • Balances fairness: big systems get more due to ridership, while the population factor supports smaller communities.

Opponents' View#

  • Earmarking fuel tax reduces the Province’s flexibility to fund other priorities in tight budget years.
  • The strict matching rule may strain small or rural municipalities and could lead to local tax increases or cuts elsewhere.
  • Tying funding to fuel sales may be less stable as electric vehicles grow and fuel use changes.
  • The right‑of‑way bonus may favor larger cities that can afford to build bus lanes, leaving smaller towns behind.
  • New reporting and data requirements add administrative work for municipalities.